United States v. James York

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 202221-10196California348 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10196

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:16-cr-00069-LHR-SKO-1 v.

JAMES YORK, AKA YD, AKA Jamari MEMORANDUM* York, AKA York Dog,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 17, 2022***

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

James York appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.