United States v. James York
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10196
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:16-cr-00069-LHR-SKO-1 v.
JAMES YORK, AKA YD, AKA Jamari MEMORANDUM* York, AKA York Dog,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge, Presiding**
Submitted May 17, 2022***
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
James York appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing…