Fulgencio Castillo Guardardo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 202217-70802California878 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAY 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FULGENCIO ESAU CASTILLO No. 17-70802

GUARDARDO,

Agency No. A095-811-433 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 20, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Fulgencio Esau Castillo Guardardo (“Guardardo”), a native and citizen of El

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) order

dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) decision denying his

application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.