Usdoj

Dennis Allums v. Usdoj

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 202220-16928California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENNIS BRUCE ALLUMS, No. 20-16928

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-04906-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

BERKELEY; BAY AREA RAPID

TRANSIT; CITY OF BERKELEY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Dennis Bruce Allums appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.