Flores

Flores v. Kertel Communications, Inc. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2022F081777California7,628 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 5/26/22 Flores v. Kertel Communications, Inc. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ADRIAN FLORES,

F081777

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19CECG01334) v.

KERTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Rosemary T. McGuire, Judge. Fishman, Larsen, & Callister, Douglas M. Larsen and Trinity E. Taylor for Defendant and Appellant. Lawyers for Employee & Consumer Rights, Shelley K. Mack and Eric D. Hitchcock for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Appellant Kertel Communications, Inc., doing business as Sebastian (Kertel), appeals the superior court’s order denying Kertel’s petition to confirm (petition to confirm) an arbitration award (Arbitration Award)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.