United States v. Kenneth McNeil

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-16750California577 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-16750

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:21-cv-00212-SOM-RT 1:02-cr-00547-SOM-1 v.

KENNETH CHARLES McNEIL, AKA MEMORANDUM* Chip,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Charles McNeil appeals pro se from the district court’s orders

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and motion for reconsideration.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a

petition for a writ of error coram nobis, see United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.