United States v. Kenneth McNeil
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-16750California577 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-16750
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:21-cv-00212-SOM-RT 1:02-cr-00547-SOM-1 v.
KENNETH CHARLES McNEIL, AKA MEMORANDUM* Chip,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Kenneth Charles McNeil appeals pro se from the district court’s orders
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and motion for reconsideration.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a
petition for a writ of error coram nobis, see United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…