Robert Gibson v. R. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202220-16001California566 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT D. GIBSON, No. 20-16001

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-04955-CRB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

R. GONZALES, Correctional Officer; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

J. AYERS; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Robert Gibson appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment and dismissal orders in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

alleging retaliation and other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Jones v. Royal Admin. Servs., Inc., 887 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.