Miguel Torres v. Ismail Patel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-15412California298 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL TORRES, No. 21-15412

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00188-NONE-

SAB

v.

ISMAIL PATEL, Dr. at KVSP; W. ULIT, MEMORANDUM* Dr. at KVSP; MARTA SPAETH, CP&S;

MANASRAH, R.N.; B. JOHN; UPPAL; S.

SERDA; SPECIAL APPEARANCE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Miguel Torres appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.