Medari Rodriguez-Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202220-71807California623 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MEDARI JAMILETH RODRIGUEZ- No. 20-71807

MARTINEZ,

Agency No. A206-004-684 Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 20, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Medari Jamileth Rodriguez-Martinez, a native and citizen of Honduras,

petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

summarily affirming the order of the immigration judge (“IJ”) denying her

applications for withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Edward R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.