Marco Amaral v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-55420California1,309 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCO AMARAL, No. 21-55420

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02409-L-LL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; JEFFREY

WILLIAMS, previously sued as FNU Williams, an individual,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, SMITH,** and BADE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge PAEZ

Plaintiff Marco Amaral appeals from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of the City of San Diego and Officer Jeffrey Williams

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable D. Brooks Smith, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. (Defendants) in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action based on Officer Williams’ use of a

maneuver…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.