Henry Elem, III v. Cynthia Kuhn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-16508California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HENRY ELEM III, No. 21-16508

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00325-JAS-PSOT

v.

CYNTHIA T. KUHN, named as Hon. MEMORANDUM* Cynthina T Kuhn, Superior Court Judge, official capacity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Henry Elem III appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s abstention determination under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.