Henry Elem, III v. Cynthia Kuhn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-16508California268 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HENRY ELEM III, No. 21-16508
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00325-JAS-PSOT
v.
CYNTHIA T. KUHN, named as Hon. MEMORANDUM* Cynthina T Kuhn, Superior Court Judge, official capacity; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Arizona state prisoner Henry Elem III appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional
claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s abstention determination under…