Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202220-55571California300 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FELIPE DIAZ, No. 20-55571
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01982-FMO-JDE
v. *
T. LINDQUIST, Law Library Coordinator at MEMORANDUM
SCP-SAC A-Yard; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Felipe Diaz appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action alleging excessive force and other constitutional violations. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo legal rulings on
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…