Chakmakian

Enrico Sierra v. Chakmakian

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202219-56291California395 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENRICO SIERRA, No. 19-56291

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-03723-SK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHAKMAKIAN, Doctor,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Steve Kim, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 17, 2022***

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Enrico Sierra appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference

to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.