Danny Fabricant v. A. Miranda
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 202221-16345California426 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANNY FABRICANT, No. 21-16345
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00029-JCH
v.
MEMORANDUM*
A. MIRANDA, individually and in his/her
official capacity as Unit C-2 Case Manager; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John C. Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Danny Fabricant appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his action
brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging an Eighth Amendment claim. We…