In re J.C. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
FACTS
J.C. came to the department’s attention when they received a referral alleging
mother tested positive for marijuana, methamphetamine, and opiates at his birth. The
department interviewed mother and J.C.’s father the same day, and both denied any
Indian ancestry.
On November 20, 2020, the department placed J.C. in protective custody. Four
days later the department filed a petition under section 300, subdivision (b), and a
detention report. The department reported they couldn’t identify any relative placements
for J.C. after talking to the parents. Father said his relatives lived out-of-state and he had
minimal contact with them. Father also said he was previously removed from his
biological parents’ care.
2 On November 25, 2020, both parents filed ICWA-020 forms (Judicial Council
Forms, form ICWA-020 (ICWA-020)). Mother denied that any of the possible Indian
statuses applied to her or J.C., and Father’s form was apparently incomplete.
The same day Riverside County Superior Court Judge Judith C. Clark held a
detention hearing. Both parents were present. Mother confirmed her ICWA-020 form
indicated she wasn’t aware of any Indian ancestry. Father also…