Wenceslao Jimenez-Islas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202216-72698California1,165 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENCESLAO JIMENEZ-ISLAS, No. 16-72698

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-648-676

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 18, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Wenceslao Jimenez-Islas challenges the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without

permission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.