Tony Fu v. City and County of San Franci

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202221-15423California603 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TONY FU, No. 21-15423

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-04668-JST

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO; MATTHEW P. SULLIVAN,

an individual and in his official capacities,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DEMAS WAI YAN, Esquire; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Tony Fu appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims related to his arrest. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Thomas v. Ponder,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.