Salvador Urbina-Alvarez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202216-70631California532 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 27 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR URBINA-ALVAREZ, AKA No. 16-70631 Isidro Venegas De Los Angeles, AKA Isidro De Los Angeles Venegas, Agency No. A078-099-986

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: McKEOWN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS,** District Judge.

The petitioner, who is referred to by both parties as “Venegas,” claims that

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) erred in upholding the decision of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable George B. Daniels, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. immigration judge (“IJ”) because the IJ violated Venegas’s due process rights. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

We reject Venegas’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.