Norma McCauley v. Fry's Food & Drug Stores Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202219-17497California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMA O. McCAULEY, No. 19-17497

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-04116-DWL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRY’S FOOD & DRUG STORES

INCORPORATED, DBA Fry’s Marketplace; JOE HARRISS, supervisor; UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Art, supervisor; named as Dennis, supervisor,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Norma O. McCauley appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her employment action alleging federal discrimination and retaliation

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.