Nicholas Stoica v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter C
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICHOLAS D. STOICA, No. 21-15279
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05288-GMS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
McDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Nicholas D. Stoica appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging various claims in connection with his employment
termination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Stoica’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…