Nicholas Stoica v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter C

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202221-15279California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS D. STOICA, No. 21-15279

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05288-GMS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

McDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Nicholas D. Stoica appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging various claims in connection with his employment

termination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Stoica’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.