Michael Foley v. Lorea Arostegui

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202220-17108California449 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL FOLEY, No. 20-17108

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00094-RFB-NJK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LOREA AROSTEGUI, Family Services Specialist; GEORGINA STUART, Family Services Specialist; DEBORAH CROWSHAW, Family Services Supervisor; LISA RUIZ-LEE, Family Services Director; COUNTY OF CLARK, NEVADA, Political Subdivision; COUNTY OF CLARK,

NEVADA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Michael Foley appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants retaliated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.