Michael Foley v. Kurt Graham

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202221-15024California530 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL FOLEY, No. 21-15024

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-01871-JAD-VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KURT GRAHAM; KENNETH BOURNE;

DOUGLAS GILLESPIE; SILVIA

TEUTON; CLARK COUNTY DETENTION

CENTER; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN

POLICE DEPARTMENT; STEVEN

WOLFSON; STEVEN GRIERSON;

MERLE LOK; PATRICIA FOLEY; CLARK

COUNTY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Michael Foley appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of his arrest and detention. We have

jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.