Daniel Rodriguez v. Stephen Morris
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202221-16024California1,389 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 27 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ, No. 21-16024
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04957-GMS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEPHEN MORRIS; ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
ARIZONA,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 8, 2022 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: PAEZ, CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Daniel A. Rodriguez appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a
writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The narrow certified issue on
appeal is whether Rodriguez’s ineffective assistance of appellate counsel (“IAAC”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. claim qualifies as cause to excuse the procedural default of his prosecutorial
misconduct claim.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We
affirm.