Anthony Manning v. Department of Veterans Affairs
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202221-15501California603 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY L. MANNING, No. 21-15501
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00494-TLN-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Anthony L. Manning appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his
Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Sandoval v. County of Sonoma, 912 F.3d 509, 515
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2018) (summary judgment); Warren v. Fox Fam. Worldwide, Inc., 328
F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th…