ehealthline.com, Inc. v. Pharmaniaga Berhad

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 202220-17182California624 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 31 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC., Nos. 20-17182 21-15642 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:18-cv-01069-MCE-EFB

PHARMANIAGA BERHAD,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MODERN INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT

HOLDING GROUP COMPANY

LIMITED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, W. FLETCHER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. E*Healthline.com (“EHL”) appeals from the district court’s final judgments

(1) dismissing its action against defendants Pharmaniaga Berhand (“Pharmaniaga”)

and Modern Industrial Investment Holding Group Company Ltd. (“Modern”) for

lack of personal jurisdiction and (2) awarding attorney’s fees to Pharmaniaga. We

have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.