William Ramirez v. County of El Dorado

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM RAMIREZ; STACEY L. No. 20-16786

RAMIREZ,

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00632-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF EL DORADO; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

William and Stacey L. Ramirez appeal pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 action alleging

various claims in connection with their eviction. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellants’ request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.…