United States v. Jose Zuniga-Contreras

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 202221-10339California260 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10339

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-00381-VC-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSE ZUNIGA-CONTRERAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Zuniga-Contreras appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for distribution of

fentanyl, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Zuniga-Contreras’s counsel has filed a brief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating that there are no grounds for relief, along…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.