United States v. Gilberto Martinez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 202221-10324California282 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 31 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10324

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00495-SRB-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GILBERTO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Gilberto Martinez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).1 We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The parties assume that Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), applies to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1) appeals. We need not reach that issue here because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.