Samuel Spencer v. Robert Sinclair
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 202221-15192California277 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SAMUEL R. SPENCER, No. 21-15192
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01266-TLN-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROBERT SINCLAIR; WILLIAM STEVEN
SHUMWAY; JOHN M. SINCLAIR;
RANDALL R. WILSON; RUSSELL P.
BALDO; SINCLAIR WILSON BALDO
AND CHAMBERLAIN, The Law Firm;
MICHAEL A. JACQUES; LAWRENCE E.
SKIDMORE; TAMI HINDS; BRIAN
WARREN; PATRICIA WARREN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Samuel R. Spencer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his action for declaratory relief challenging two California state…