Samuel Spencer v. Robert Sinclair

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 202221-15192California277 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL R. SPENCER, No. 21-15192

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01266-TLN-AC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT SINCLAIR; WILLIAM STEVEN

SHUMWAY; JOHN M. SINCLAIR;

RANDALL R. WILSON; RUSSELL P.

BALDO; SINCLAIR WILSON BALDO

AND CHAMBERLAIN, The Law Firm;

MICHAEL A. JACQUES; LAWRENCE E.

SKIDMORE; TAMI HINDS; BRIAN

WARREN; PATRICIA WARREN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Samuel R. Spencer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his action for declaratory relief challenging two California state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.