Ian Cormier v. Riverside County Da Office
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IAN LAMONTE CORMIER, No. 21-56268
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-01654-SVW-AFM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RIVERSIDE COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OFFICE; LEON X., Deputy Sheriff (Detective), individual/official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Cormier’s motion for in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status (Docket Entry No. 3)
is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The Clerk will
file the Opening Brief at Docket Entry No. 5.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ian LaMonte Cormier appeals pro se from the district court’s order…