Plyley

Plyley v. Renovating Specialist, Inc. CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2022B309457California4,280 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/31/22 Plyley v. Renovating Specialist, Inc. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

GEORGE M. PLYLEY, 2d Civil No. B309457 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2018- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00520231-CU-BC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

RENOVATING SPECIALIST,

INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

As the trial court noted, “[T]his action arises from a home improvement contract of under $4,000.” The contract involved the installation of two sliding glass doors at appellant George M. Plyley’s residence. The installer was respondent Renovating Specialist, Inc. (RSI). RSI’s salesperson was respondent Jay Steven Nudelman. The new doors worked properly and passed inspection, but appellant claimed they did not meet the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.