People v. Esparza CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2022C094998California223 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

BACKGROUND

A March 2020 complaint alleged that, while in custody at a state prison in September 2019, defendant possessed a controlled substance or paraphernalia. (Pen.

1 Code, § 4573.6, subd. (a).)1 The complaint further alleged that defendant suffered a prior serious felony conviction for purposes of section 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) (the prior strike allegation). Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, defendant pleaded no contest to the charge and the prior strike allegation was dismissed. The trial court sentenced defendant to one year in state prison. The trial court imposed a $300 restitution fine, a stayed $300 parole revocation fine, a $40 court security fee, and a $30 conviction assessment. Defendant timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

Counsel filed an opening brief that set forth the facts and procedural history of the case and asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.