Mark Stuart v. City of Scottsdale

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 202221-15504California1,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK STUART, DBA Save Our Preserve No. 21-15504 Political Action Committee of Scottsdale, DBA Save Our Preserve, Inc., an Individual D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01848-DJH and Chairman,

Plaintiff-Appellant, MEMORANDUM*

and

SAVE OUR PRESERVE, INC., an Arizona corporation on behalf of its members; MARGARET STUART, DBA Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale, an Individual and Treasurer,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Mark Stuart appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.