Barth

Johnny Jones, III v. Barth

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 202222-15205California289 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY LEE JONES III, No. 22-15205

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00028-MMD-

CSD

v.

BARTH, Sgt.; HOWARD, Officer; COSBY, MEMORANDUM* Officer; THOMPSON, Officer; WARREN

JOHNSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Johnny Lee Jones III appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment violations. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.