Jean Darbouze v. Stephan Christopher
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 1 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEAN MAX DARBOUZE, No. 21-55133
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02964-CJC-JDE
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEPHAN CHRISTOPHER, Deputy, individual; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Jean Max Darbouze appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging failure to protect while he was a
pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo. Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010) (dismissal under Fed. R.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Civ. P. 12(b)(6));…