Clement Babatunde v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 202219-70815California880 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLEMENT TAIWO BABATUNDE, AKA No. 19-70815 T. Clement Babatunde, Agency No. A206-881-658 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2022 Portland, Oregon

Before: BERZON and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK,** District Judge.

Clement Taiwo Babatunde appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) decision ordering him removed. We lack jurisdiction over two of the

issues Babatunde raises but remand for consideration of the third.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Frederic Block, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. 1. We do not have subject matter jurisdiction over issues a petitioner fails to

raise before the BIA. See Barron v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.