JHM Ventures v. Cavalier Closeouts CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 1, 2022B305724California4,881 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 6/1/22 JHM Ventures v. Cavalier Closeouts CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JHM VENTURES, B305724

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC681286 v.

CAVALIER CLOSEOUTS, INC.

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEALS from a judgment and an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. David Sotelo, Judge. Affirmed.

LevatoLaw and Stephen D. Weisskopf for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Woolf & Nachimson and Chaim J. Woolf for Defendants and Respondents. _________________________ JHM Ventures (Plaintiff) filed a complaint against Cavalier Closeouts, Inc. and Eyal Dahan (together Defendants) alleging they breached written contracts related to three business deals.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.