Susan Baker v. Dean Meiling
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202221-15957California771 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 2 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SUSAN BAKER, an individual; et al., No. 21-15957
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00518-MMD-CLB v.
DEAN MEILING, an individual; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees,
JANET CHUBB, an individual; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
MEILING FAMILY PARTNERS, LTD.,
Defendant,
DOES, 1-100, inclusive,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Argued and Submitted May 11, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: W. FLETCHER and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and KANE,** District Judge.
Plaintiffs—fifty-one investors in and former members of Metalast
International, LLC (“MILLC”)—appeal from the district court’s grant of a Rule
12(b)(6) motion to dismiss brought by Defendants Dean Meiling; Madylon