Jerry Alexander v. Dean Meiling

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202220-16688California1,307 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 2 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY ALEXANDER; et al., No. 20-16688

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00572-MMD-CLB v.

DEAN MEILING; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

JERRY ALEXANDER; et al., No. 21-15223

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00572-MMD-CLB v.

DEAN MEILING; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

JANET CHUBB; et al.,

Defendants.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 11, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and KANE,** District Judge.

In appeal No. 20-16688, Plaintiffs—twenty-two investors in and former

members of Metalast International, LLC (“MILLC”)—appeal from the district

court’s grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss brought by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.