United States v. Justin Werle
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-36005 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 2:20-cv-00184-WFN 2:14-cr-00041-WFN-
JUSTIN CURTIS WERLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 4, 2021 Seattle, Washington
Filed June 3, 2022
Before: A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr. SUMMARY *
28 U.S.C. § 2255
The panel vacated the district court’s summary denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in which Justin Curtis Werle seeks to vacate his felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(a)(2) and 922(g)(1), and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
Werle sought to vacate the conviction because he pled guilty without being informed of the mens rea element announced in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)—i.e., that the Government must prove not only that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm, but also…