People v. Geise CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 2022B312016California4,415 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tangeman, J.

Filed 6/3/22 P. v. Geise CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B312016 (Super. Ct. No. 2001019839) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

RICHARD JOHN GEISE, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Richard John Geise, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for Penal Code1 section 1170.95 resentencing. He contends the court erred when it: (1) determined that prosecutors proved he is ineligible for resentencing, and (2) considered the trial judge’s comments about the evidence when making that determination. We affirm.

1 Statutory references are to the Penal Code.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Central Market shooting Toni Manzetti had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.