William Klaehn v. Cali Bamboo, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202221-55738California1,422 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM KLAEHN, et al., No. 21-55738

Plaintiff-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01498-TWR-

KSC

v.

CALI BAMBOO LLC, et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, BUMATAY, Circuit Judge, and BAKER,** International Trade Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellants, a putative class of purchasers of flooring sold by

Defendant-Appellee Cali Bamboo (“Cali”), appeal from the district court’s dismissal

with prejudice of their third amended complaint, which asserts California Consumer

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Legal Remedies Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.