Bowen

Bowen v. Lin CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 6, 2022B312831California3,326 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tangeman, J.

Filed 6/6/22 Bowen v. Lin CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

RAY B. BOWEN, JR., 2d Civil No. B312831 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Cross-complainant and 00547900-CU-BC-VTA) Appellant, (Ventura County)

v.

VICTOR LIN et al.,

Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Victor and Yvonne1 Lin and their adult children Calvin and Gail moved to strike a cross-complaint filed by Ray B. Bowen, Jr., as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). The trial court granted Gail’s motion to strike the causes of action against her, but denied the other motions. In their appeal, Victor, Yvonne, and Calvin contend the court should have stricken the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.