Shanna Offutt Evanger v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202221-35624California1,002 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHANNA OFFUTT EVANGER, No. 21-35624

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05521-BJR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Shanna Offutt Evanger (“Offutt”) appeals a judgment for defendant

Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC (“Georgia-Pacific”) on her employment

discrimination claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Offutt first claims that Judge Rothstein did not have the discretion to alter

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.