Paddy Okoth v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202220-70599California833 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PADDY OSEWE OKOTH, No. 20-70599

Petitioner, Agency Nos. A201-004-925 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** S.R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Paddy Osewe Okoth (“Okoth”) petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen. Okoth also raises for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. 1 the first time an ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) claim. We have

jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.