Indirect Purchaser Class v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202221-16291California2,720 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 6 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE No. 21-16291
PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION,
D.C. No. 3:10-md-02143-RS ------------------------------
INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CONNER ERWIN,
Objector-Appellant,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.;
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Argued and Submitted April 19, 2022 Seattle, Washington
Before: GOULD, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge CHRISTEN.
This case concerns attorneys’ fees awarded to Hagens Berman Sobol
Shapiro, LLP (HB), class counsel for a class of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (IPP)
in a lengthy multidistrict antitrust suit. We previously vacated the district court’s
decisions awarding a total of $52,780,000 in attorneys’ fees…