Donaciano Medellin-Delgado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202215-73188California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONACIANO MEDELLIN-DELGADO, No. 15-73188

Petitioner, Agency No. A094-957-863

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and AMON,*** District Judge.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied Petitioner Donaciano

Medellin-Delgado’s application for cancellation of removal concluding that his

California forgery conviction is a crime involving moral turpitude that disqualifies

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. him for relief. Medellin-Delgado seeks review arguing that intent to defraud was not

a required element of his forgery conviction,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.