Angel Perez Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202216-71325California1,110 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL TOMAS PEREZ RODRIGUEZ, No. 16-71325

Petitioner, Agency No. A204-506-845

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and BADE, Circuit Judges, and CARDONE,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Angel Tomas Perez Rodriguez (“Perez”) petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA” or “Board”) decision denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (“CAT”). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.