Frank Atwood v. David Shinn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 202222-15821California183 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 7 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK JARVIS ATWOOD, No. 22-15821

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-00860-MTL-JZB District of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Phoenix Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry; et al.,

ORDER

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: S. R. THOMAS, Circuit Judge and Capital Case Coordinator

The three-judge panel has issued an opinion affirming the judgment of the

district court and denying the request for a stay of execution. The Appellant

subsequently filed a Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Pursuant to the rules

applicable to capital cases when an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline

was established for any judge to request a vote on whether the panel opinion

should be reheard en banc. No judge requested a vote within the established time

period. Therefore, en banc proceedings with respect to the panel opinion are

concluded. The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.