Davis

Davis v. Harano

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2022B306575California1,284 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 6/8/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

ANTHONY DAVIS, B306575

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC692726 v.

TYLER RAY HARANO,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James A. Kaddo, Judge. Affirmed.

Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, Andrew M. Jacobson, Christopher A. Kanne; The Pirnia Law Group and Ardy Pirnia for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Horvitz & Levy, Lacey L. Estudillo, Karen M. Bray; Gates, Gonter, Guy, Proudfoot & Muench and Gina Y. Kandarian-Stein for Defendant and Respondent.

____________________ The jury disbelieved Anthony Davis’s claim that a 2017 rear-ender caused him $1.5 million in damages. We affirm. I We present the facts in favor of the prevailing party. In 2016, an accident totalled Davis’s car. He retained counsel, sued about pain in his neck and elsewhere, and settled. When his medical care ended in 2016, Davis still was claiming neck pain. In 2017, Tyler Ray Harano’s car made contact with Davis’s rear bumper. Photos show only slight damage to Davis’s bumper.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.