Davis
Davis v. Harano
Opinion
Opinion
Wiley, J.
Filed 6/8/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
ANTHONY DAVIS, B306575
Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC692726 v.
TYLER RAY HARANO,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James A. Kaddo, Judge. Affirmed.
Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, Andrew M. Jacobson, Christopher A. Kanne; The Pirnia Law Group and Ardy Pirnia for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Horvitz & Levy, Lacey L. Estudillo, Karen M. Bray; Gates, Gonter, Guy, Proudfoot & Muench and Gina Y. Kandarian-Stein for Defendant and Respondent.
____________________ The jury disbelieved Anthony Davis’s claim that a 2017 rear-ender caused him $1.5 million in damages. We affirm. I We present the facts in favor of the prevailing party. In 2016, an accident totalled Davis’s car. He retained counsel, sued about pain in his neck and elsewhere, and settled. When his medical care ended in 2016, Davis still was claiming neck pain. In 2017, Tyler Ray Harano’s car made contact with Davis’s rear bumper. Photos show only slight damage to Davis’s bumper.…