Elmer Hernandez-Martinez v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 202220-72803California463 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 8 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELMER HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, No. 20-72803
Petitioner, Agency No. A072-398-348
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted May 18, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: KLEINFELD, MILLER, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Elmer Hernandez-Martinez argues in his petition for review that the Board
of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) erred in affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)
decision to deny his applications for withholding of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1231(b)(3)(A) and for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.
Petitioner argues his proffered social groups are legally cognizable.